HEAVY METAL DISCHARGE FROM OSELLINO CANAL TO THE VENICE LAGOON: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE “DRAIN” PROJECT.
Roberto Zonta, Flaviano Collavini, and Luca
Zaggia (National Research Council - I.S.D.G.M., S.Polo 1364, Venezia - 30125,
Italy e-mail: zonta@flux.isdgm.ve.cnr.it); Cristina Marinelli and Omar E.
Fagarazzi (SELC Inc., Via Castellana 40, Mestre - Venezia- 30174, Italy)
Data
presented are the result of the investigation on total and dissolved heavy
metals in the Osellino Canal (Venice Lagoon – northern Italy) for the period
between June and October 1998, when extremely
different flow regime, from base flow to peak flood, occurred. This
provided an overview on processes governing the behaviour of total and
dissolved metals under varying river discharges. An estimate of the
corresponding load transferred from the studied basin to the lagoon during the
monitoring period is also given.
The
drainage basin of the Venice Lagoon (northern Italy - Figure 1 a,b) is
developed on a highly populated (about one million of inhabitants) and
industrial floodplain. About 70% of its
1800 km˛ surface area is also occupied by cultivated lands. The estimate
of annual freshwater and contaminants load from the basin is the main focus of
the DRAIN project (“DeteRmination of pollutAnt INputs from the drainage
basin”).

Figure
1. (a) Location of the Venice Lagoon (northern Italy). (b) Map of drainage
basin of the lagoon; the Marzenego River basin is shadowed. (c) Map of the
lower Marzenego basin; the location of the stations for discharge and
physico-chemical measurement are indicated.
The
research started in May 1998 on behalf of the Consorzio Venezia Nuova -
Magistrato alle Acque di Venezia (Italian Ministry of Public Works) and will be
concluded in August 2000. Fresh water discharge in the eleven main tributaries
of the lagoon is continuously measured and heavy metal, nutrient and organic
micro-pollutant concentrations are determined. Among these tributaries, the
Marzenego River - Osellino Canal (Figure 1b) is of particular interest, because
it receives the effluents from the large urban district of Mestre (200,000
inhabitants).
The
river system, which originates on the spring belt of the Venetian floodplain,
drains a crop area of 47 km2 and has an overall length of 47 km. In
the upper course, the stream is denominated Marzenego River and, after
traversing the urban centre of Mestre, it is named Osellino Canal. It the
follows a 3 km straight course (Figure 1c) finally discharging in the Venice
Lagoon through Le Rotte Canal. The present contribution describes the main
results of the study of circulation and heavy metal behaviour in the first 5
months of monitoring, corresponding to the Phase 1 of the DRAIN project (from
18th of May to 17th of October 1998).


The location of the sections for the acquisition of discharge and
physico-chemical variables are shown in Figure 1c. Section 1 is positioned
immediately downstream of Mestre, to monitor the input of the urban wastewater
not collected by the sewer system. Starting from the second half of July 1998,
a self-recording current meter was employed in section 2; the recorded time
series of current speed were calibrated by manual discharge evaluations with
the normal velocity-area technique, obtaining a continuous time series of
freshwater discharge. Two other sections (3 and 4) are respectively located in
the Le Rotte Canal and in the eastern Osellino branch.
The
sampling strategy was designed in order to observe hourly-to-monthly variations
along the vertical profile, according to the tide excursion and different
hydrologic regimen. Water samples, collected in sections 1 and 2 for the
determination of total and dissolved concentrations (Fe, Mn, As, Cd, Cr, Cu,
Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) were treated according to the EPA method 3005A/92. The metal
analyses were performed by ICP-MS, following the EPA method 6020/94 rev.0.
The
trend of the measured freshwater discharge is reported in Figure 2. Since the
continuous record started on July 21st, an estimate based on a large
set of point measurements is given for the previous period. The average
rainfall on the Osellino-Marzenego basin is also reported on top of the figure.
Until
the first half of July 1998, the freshwater discharge was appreciable
("base flow", average discharge, QA = 1.6 m3s-1), because of
the frequent rainfall events over the catchment area. The low discharge of the
following period ("drought", QA = 0.8 m3s-1)
was occasionally interrupted by a few relative increases of the flow, induced
by regulation manoeuvres in small upstream tributaries. In September, a new
period characterised by rainfall events restored the base flow (QA
= 1.8 m3s-1), until a flood event (October 5th
through 9th) dramatically raised the average river discharge up to a
value of 14 m3s-1. Return periods as high as 40 years in
the upper and middle Marzenego basin, and about 3 years in the district of
Mestre were evaluated from rainfall data by the Gumbel extreme value method
(Gumbel, 1958; Richards, 1982).
The
observed changes of the river regimen are accompanied by relevant variations in
the concentration of metals. Figure 3
shows the trend of average total and dissolved Mn and Zn concentrations in
freshwater samples, which are representative of the behaviour of the major part
of the analysed elements. If compared to the base flow conditions, the
dissolved concentrations in the drought period are higher for almost all
metals. This increase, which is limited for Zn, As, Cd and Pb, is instead
considerable for Mn, Cu and Ni, and is possibly related to the release of
metals from the anoxic sediment of the channel bottom. This process is favoured
by both the slack dynamics and the progressive decay of the water quality in
summer months, which is reflected by decreasing trend of redox potential,
dissolved oxygen and pH. Once in the water column, metals remain in solution as
far as reducing conditions are maintained.
The
flood event of October caused a 10-fold average increment of suspended particle
matter, determining a sharp increase of metal concentrations. This peak of
concentrations occurred not only for metals associated to the lattice of clay
particle and amorphous hydrous-oxides (Fe, Mn, Cr and Ni), but also for
anthropogenic elements such as Zn, Pb, Cu and, to a minor extent, As. Despite
the dramatic changes in the river regime, dissolved concentrations did not show
significant variations in flood conditions.
![]()

Table 1 shows the estimated average values of total and dissolved heavy
metal loads. Data refer to the three different flow regimen (base flow, drought
and flood) and are also presented as the total load for the entire monitoring
period. Finally, the table reports the daily loads and the ratios between
values of flood versus both the other two regimen.
Generally,
it can be observed that, with the exception of As and Hg, the flood transports
a percentage greater than 50% of the total metal load (from 52% to 78% for Fe).
The high discharge, combined to increased concentration of the particulate metal
fraction, yield by soil erosion and re-mobilisation of channel materials,
strongly affected the rate of total metal transport.
If
compared to daily values computed for the flood conditions, the daily load of
total Fe and, to a minor extent, of Pb and Zn, for the drought period, is practically negligible. Although the
dissolved concentrations do not differ during the flood, the considerable
increase in flow magnitude determines a proportional increase of dissolved load.
Anyway, with respect to the whole monitoring period, the base flow transfers
the larger proportion of the dissolved load (from 50% for Ni to 65% for Cr).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Total |
Fe |
As |
Cd |
Cr |
Mn |
Hg |
Ni |
Pb |
Cu |
Zn |
|
|||||||
|
Base flow (91 days) |
8322
(19) |
100
(53) |
1.1
(35) |
18
(29) |
677
(36) |
1.0
(69) |
44
(36) |
38
(22) |
71
(27) |
327
(31) |
||||||||
|
Drought (41 days) |
1240
(3) |
29
(15) |
0.2
(6) |
5
(8) |
224
(12) |
0.2
(18) |
11
(9) |
9
(5) |
17
(6) |
53
(5) |
||||||||
|
Flood (5 days) |
34248
(78) |
59
(32) |
1.9
(59) |
40
(63) |
975
(52) |
0.2
(13) |
66
(55) |
125
(73) |
173
(67) |
680
(64) |
||||||||
|
Load (137 days) |
43810 |
188 |
3.2 |
63 |
1876 |
1.4 |
121 |
172 |
261 |
1060 |
||||||||
|
daily |
Base flow |
91 |
1.1 |
0.012 |
0.2 |
7 |
0.01 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
3.6 |
|||||||
|
Drought |
30 |
0.7 |
0.005 |
0.1 |
5 |
0.01 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
1.3 |
||||||||
|
Flood |
6850 |
11.8 |
0.375 |
8.0 |
195 |
0.04 |
13 |
25 |
35 |
136 |
||||||||
|
Flood/Base |
75 |
11 |
31 |
39 |
26 |
3 |
28 |
60 |
45 |
38 |
||||||||
|
Flood/Drought |
226 |
17 |
78 |
69 |
36 |
6 |
51 |
120 |
85 |
106 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Dissolved |
Fe |
As |
Cd |
Cr |
Mn |
Hg |
Ni |
Pb |
Cu |
Zn |
||||||||
|
Base flow (91 days) |
643
(57) |
93
(63) |
0.40
(60) |
15
(65) |
528
(63) |
- |
24
(50) |
7
(56) |
29
(51) |
84
(62) |
||||||||
|
Drought (41 days) |
155
(14) |
26
(18) |
0.05
(7) |
3
(15) |
176
(21) |
- |
7
(14) |
3
(23) |
8
(14) |
25
(19) |
||||||||
|
Flood (5 days) |
333
(29) |
28
(19) |
0.22
(33) |
5
(20) |
135
(16) |
- |
18
(36) |
3
(21) |
20
(35) |
26
(19) |
||||||||
|
Load (137 days) |
1131 |
147 |
0.67 |
23 |
839 |
- |
49 |
13 |
57 |
135 |
||||||||
|
daily |
Base flow |
7 |
1.0 |
0.004 |
0.2 |
6 |
- |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
|||||||
|
Drought |
4 |
0.6 |
0.001 |
0.1 |
4 |
- |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
||||||||
|
Flood |
67 |
5.6 |
0.044 |
0.9 |
27 |
- |
3.5 |
0.5 |
3.9 |
5.2 |
||||||||
|
Flood/Base |
9 |
5 |
10 |
6 |
5 |
- |
13 |
7 |
12 |
6 |
||||||||
|
Flood/Drought |
18 |
9 |
39 |
12 |
6 |
- |
21 |
7 |
20 |
9 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Table 1. Total and dissolved metal loads (kilograms) discharged in the Venice Lagoon from the Osellino-Marzenego tributary basin. The percentages of total load are reported in parentheses. For dissolved Hg, which was always below the analytical detection limit, the loads are not computed.
The
monitoring activity of the research project is still in progress and the
continuous input of data determines a progressive upgrade of the results and a
refinement of load estimates. However, the information acquired during the
Phase 1 can provide useful indications on the dynamics of pollutant transfer
from the drainage basin. The occurrence of an
exceptional flood event in a period mainly characterised by low-to-base flow
conditions permitted, in fact, the comparison of freshwater discharge and
pollutant load from the studied system to the lagoon in extremely different flow
regime.
Gumbel
E J (1958), J. Inst. Water Eng. 12: 157-184.
Richards
K (1982), Rivers, Form and Processes in Alluvial Channels. New York, Meuthen.