STUDY OF PARTICULATE MATTER AND HEAVY-METAL FLUXES IN THE VENICE CANAL NETWORK BY LARGE VOLUME FILTRATION AND SEDIMENT TRAPS

 

Luca Zaggia, Roberto Zonta, and Flaviano Collavini (National Research Council - I.S.D.G.M., S. Polo 1364, Venezia - 30125, Italy. e-mail:zaggia@isdgm.ve.cnr.it); Cinzia Bettiol (Department of Environmental Sciences, Ca' Foscari University, Dorsoduro 2137, Venezia - 30123, Italy)

 

ABSTRACT

 

During a research on the dynamics and environmental quality of the water-sediment compartments in the Venice canal network, a study on heavy metal and suspended particulate matter (SPM) was performed in a pilot subsystem. Measurements of current velocity were linked to a study on heavy metals in the SPM collected by large volume filtration and sediment traps. Total heavy metal concentrations and grain-size distribution were determined on materials yielded by the two procedures, providing useful information on SPM dynamics in the water column and an estimate of contaminant fluxes. The study revealed as only a minor part of the polluted particulate vehiculated in the network, and continuously resuspended by the effect of tidal currents and boat traffic, undergoes to deposition within the system.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The City of Venice (Northern Italy), which appears in Figure 1, is located in the central part of a coastal lagoon, a 550 km2 body of water connected to the Adriatic Sea by three inlets. The city is traversed by an intricate canal network, with a linear extension of about 40 km and a mean depth of 1 m, which is characterised by a complex water circulation pattern determined by the tide. The average tide excursion ranges from about 20 to 80 cm, respectively in neap and spring tide conditions and salinity generally ranges from 27 to 33 psu. Water exchanges are mainly driven by the Canal Grande, which is connected to the sea by first order tidal channels originating from the Lido inlet.

Text Box: Figure 1. Map of the investigated system. Measurement section (A) and sediment trap sites (1, 2) are indicated.A large amount of organic matter and pollutants from domestic effluents and commercial activities are discharged in the canal network, in which the slack hydrodynamics favours the progressive accumulation of reduced (Eh » -200 mV) and highly contaminated sludge. Channel silting determine undesirable impacts on navigation and hygienic conditions.

The maintenance operations for the canal network include dredging and the improvement of the sewer system. However, due to the complex morphology and the short term variability induced by tide, it is quite difficult to define reliable criteria to assess the effects of the maintenance operations on the water quality. A preliminary understanding of the mechanisms of transport, the deposition of particulate matter, and the associated pollutants, is therefore necessary to investigate the input and fate of the contaminants in this system. With this aim, a study on heavy metals in the suspended particulate matter (SPM) was performed in a pilot subsystem (Figure 1) consisting of three interlinked canals fed by the Canal Grande. The characteristics of suspended particulate matter, as well as metal concentrations, were investigated by different techniques including small and large volume filtration (SVF, LVF) and sediment traps. The research activity was conducted on behalf of the Consorzio Venezia Nuova – Magistrato alle Acque di Venezia (Italian Ministry of the Public Works).

 

METHODS

 

The study was conducted during a 36-hours period from the 18th through the 19th of October 1997, during a particularly high spring tide excursion (about 100 cm). Continuous measurement of current velocity was performed in Section A (Figure 1) by a self recording current meter positioned at a depth of 50 cm near the bottom of the canal.

The trend of SPM was investigated by small volume filtration (SVF) performed at hourly intervals following a half –tide cycle from 7.00 to 19.00 on October 19th. Water samples from surface and bottom layers were filtered on pre-weighed 0.4 µm polycarbonate membranes and the concentration of SPM was obtained by weight loss after drying the samples at the temperature of 105 °C.

To obtain representative samples of the SPM in sufficient amounts to permit heavy metal and grain-size analysis, five LVF runs were executed at almost regular intervals in the same period covered by SVF. A volume of approximately 2 m3 of canal water, collected from the half depth of the water column, was filtered through 0.5 µm cartridges during 1 hour interval for each LVF run. The material was successively recovered by ultrasonic washing and centrifugation.

Text Box: Figure 2. Trends of axial velocity and tide level acquired during the 36 hours monitoring period by the S4 current meter in Section A (18th through 19th of October). Positive values correspond to a northward direction of the flow.

Sediment traps with a 2÷1 H/W geometry (Gardner 1980 a, b) were placed at an height of about 30 cm from the canal bottom in two sections (Sites 1 and 2, Figure 1) and left in place for an overall period of 15 days. Two sampling periods (6 and 9 days) were established in order to differentiate the fluxes of materials in neap (first period) and spring (second period) tide conditions.

The particulate yielded by LVF and sediment traps was analysed for total heavy metal concentrations (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Zn) by A.A.S. after a 8M HN03 microwave digestion; grain-size distribution was also determined by a laser particle-size analyser.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

The trend of the axial component of the current velocity and tide level acquired by the current meter in Section A are shown in Figure 2. Velocity data has been obtained from a smoothing procedure of the first order, to reduce the fluctuations present  in the original records. In the early flood, the flow is directed northward and the tide forcing from the southern bend of Canal Grande transports water from the inner part of the canal network. The SPM concentrations, reported in Figure 3, increases particularly in the lower layer, in which resuspension events occur in the correspondence of the maximum current velocity. In the late flood, clearer water coming from the southern bend of Canal Grande, which is relatively closer to the Lido sea inlet, pervades the system. The observed decrease of SPM concentration and the disappearance of vertical gradients is a consequence of both dilution and the inhibition of resuspension phenomena by the high water head and the slack dynamics. During the ebb phase, the system is drained from the south drawing water from the northern bend of Canal Grande. The progressive increase of current speed induces an increase of SPM concentrations and the vertical gradient is again observed. A peak of concentrations with a uniform vertical distribution is measured in the minimum tide phase (about 22 mg/l around 19.15) as a consequence of the resuspension in the low water head. The trend of currents and SPM data evidence the role of resuspension by shear stress and boat traffic, in controlling the presence of  particulate in the system.

Text Box: Figure 3. Surface and bottom concentrations of suspended particulate matter determined by SVF. The intervals of the LVF runs (1 thru 5) are superimposed on the tide curve of October 19th.Heavy metal concentrations in the particulate collected by LVF and sediment traps are reported in Table 1. Although LVF samples were collected following a high amplitude tide cycle, the values display a quite constant trend. Metal concentrations are generally high; in particular the levels of Zn and Cu is the result of the continuous input of contaminants from different sources (Zaggia and Zonta, 1997).

The materials collected by sediment traps in the two different sampling periods show an even more constant trend of concentrations. Standard deviations for LVF and sediment traps samples is respectively of the order of 10% and 5% of the average values.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fe

Mn

Cd

Zn

Cu

Pb

Ni

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LVF

Run 1

29200

411

3.5

732

193

128

29.8

 

Run 2

25200

434

2.4

699

181

131

25.9

 

Run 3

30700

458

2.4

602

174

127

26.0

 

Run 4

31800

456

2.4

659

154

134

24.4

 

Run 5

25300

355

2.5

600

151

127

20.1

 

Average

28440

423

2.6

658

171

129

25.2

 

st.dev

3055

42

0.5

58

18

3

3.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trap 1

Period 1

29700

408

2.6

802

192

156

20.3

 

Period 2

29200

379

2.9

1060

203

166

20.6

Trap 2

Period 1

28800

390

2.8

962

188

167

19.4

 

Period 2

27400

361

2.8

988

190

151

19.6

 

Average

28775

385

2.8

953

193

160

20.0

 

st.dev

988

20

0.1

109

7

8

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canal sludge

Average

25338

367

3.3

732

195

162

24.2

“s” Sites

st.dev

4215

135

1.8

277

64

70

14.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1. Heavy metals concentrations (mg/kg, d.w.) in the particulate collected by LVF and sediment traps; for comparison, average data from the canal sludge of the area are reported .

Table 1 also shows, for comparison, the average concentrations found in the sludge from canals of the inner part of the investigated system. Data refers to 40 cm-long sediment cores collected in the sites indicated with “s” in Figure 1 (from the Venice Municipal Authority’s database). Despite the close correspondence of average values among the sludge samples and SPM obtained by both LVF and sediment traps, a great variability characterises the metal distribution in the sludge of the canal bottom. This variability is the direct consequence of the presence of a large number of contaminant sources of and the poor vertical homogeneity of the collected cores.

As for heavy metals, the grain-size spectra of  the two groups of 5 LVF and 4 traps samples show no significant differences; therefore each of the averaged distributions is representative of the relative set of samples (Figure 4). Besides a partial overlap in the finest region and the occurrence of  two peaks centred on 1.5 and 7 µm in both the distributions, materials collected by the traps show a coarser spectrum with a main peak around 30 µm and about 40 % of the particles in the range of diameter comprised between 20 and 300 µm. This feature is an expected consequence of the greater efficiency of sediment traps in collecting coarser materials entrained by turbulence in the near-bottom layer.

The flux of particulate recorded by sediment traps is higher in spring tide (130 and 170 gm-2d-1 for trap 1 and 2) than in neap tide conditions (respectively 97 and 123 gm-2d-1). In spring tide conditions current speeds are, in fact, more intense and the water head frequently reaches very low levels favouring entrainment and transport in the system. The higher yield obtained in Site 2 is instead primarily related to resuspension induced by boat manoeuvring in a narrowing of the canal section.

Sediment traps data can be finally used for a comparison of the fluxes of suspended particulate matter with the average sedimentation rates. Typical values estimated for the canal network from the rate of silting and radio-dating techniques, are of the order of 1 cmy-1. The fluxes obtained by sediment traps return instead a value about 3 times greater, suggesting that only a minor amount of materials transported in the system constitutes the net sedimentation. Therefore, the major part of SPM undergoes a frequent reworking by both natural and man-induced resuspension.Text Box: Figure 4. Average grain-size distributions in samples collected by LVF and sediment traps. The continual cycling of highly contaminated particles in the water column of a partially confined environment, such as the investigated subsystem, represents a risk for the long-term effects associated with the release of toxic elements (Collavini et al., 2000). These particular aspects have been already considered in the study of analogous systems and will be further investigated by detailed researches.

 

REFERENCES

 

Collavini F, Zonta R, Arizzi Novelli A and Zaggia L (2000), Environ. Toxicol. Chem., Submitted.

Gardner WD (1980a), J. Mar. Res. 38:17-39.

Gardner WD (1980b), J. Mar. Res. 38:41-52.

Zaggia L and Zonta R (1997), Applied Geochem. 12:527-536.