NEW APPROACH FOR ASSESSING DECONTAMINATION PROCESSES
BY CHEMICAL SPECIATION COMBINED WITH BIOASSAYS
Heinz Stichnothe, Alexander Weissbach, Helga
Neumann-Hensel, Wolfgang Calmano
Technical University Hamburg-Harburg, Department of Environmental Science and Technology, Eissendorferstrasse 40, 21071 Hamburg, Germany
contact e-mail: stichnothe@tu-harburg.de
ABSTRACT
The combination of chemical speciation by means of
sequential extraction, XAFS (x-ray fine structure spectroscopy) thermodynamical
calculations and bioassays seems to have a promising future. Due to
thermodynamical calculations with PHREEQC the formation of mixed Pb-salts is
predicted. At the moment the signification of the formation of these mixed
salts for the XAFS reference substances database has still to be evaluated.
Nevertheless the existence of these mixed salts could be verified due to x-ray
diffractometer analysis. Thermodynamical modelling is a useful tool for
determination of reference substances, process parameters and also for prediction
of chemical species during leaching process or operational methods like
sequential extraction.
A simple relation between chemical species and
toxicity effects could not bee observed. Even natural matrix compounds like
humic acid, Fe-complexes or citric acid bring out toxicity effects for both
applied bioassays algae test and soil contact test. The mechanism of the toxic
effect is still under investigation. With these results the application of
bioassays due to their extremely high sensitivity has to be examined before
they can be used as an assessment tools for decontamination processes.
INTRODUCTION
Heavy metals in soils are still a challenging problem
all over the world. Various remediation technologies are applied, e.g.
extraction procedures, electrokinetic and soil washing. Due to the constraint
that heavy metals, except elemental mercury, have a very high boiling point and
can not be bioconverted, usually leaching processes have to be applied to
remove heavy metals from soil. Such a leaching process must combine high
extraction efficiency and low waste water volume. These prerequisites can be
realized by a circuit process where heavy metals are removed from the
extraction solvent by means of electrolysis and then reused again. But how to
assess the efficiency of this process? Considering just the heavy metal content
will not answer the question of detoxification of soil due to the treatment. A
new approach using a model soil has been undertaken to combine heavy metal
speciation by XAFS (x-ray fine structure spectroscopy) with thermodynamical
calculations and bioassays to improve the extraction process as well as refer
toxicity data to chemical species.
METHODS
A model soil composed of quarz, goethite, humic acid
and clay is contaminated with different lead species, like PbO2,
PbCl2, PbCO3 and PbSO4. The compounds are
mixed and stirred for 24 h afterwards the soil is dried at room temperature.
This soil is used for the further investigations. The speciation and
distribution of the lead species on different soil compartments after
establishing of equilibrium and after an extraction procedure are performed by
sequential extraction and XAFS (X-ray adsorption fine structure spectroscopy).
XAFS is able to provide us with information about the real binding form of
heavy metals in soils without interacting with the matrix. Furthermore the XAFS
–spectra contain information about the binding form of several metals in
different soil components like humic acid or clay. The evaluation is performed
by comparison of the real spectra data with linear combinations of reference
substances, e.g. Pb-salts as well as assoziates of lead with soil compounds
like humic acid Mn- or Fe-oxides /Welter/.
The sequential extraction scheme of Zeien&Bruemmer
and the BCR were conducted according to URE
to try to evaluate the operationally defined fractions with the XAFS-
data. Both methods are selected to answer the question whether an extended use
of defined fractions improves the characterization of heavy metals in soils.
The Zeine&Bruemmer scheme is subdivided into seven defined fractions and
the BCR method just in three.
To investigate the detoxification potential, a test
battery containing algae bioassay, microbiological contact assay is conducted.
The toxicity is determined indirectly by measuring the effect of the elutriate
with the algae growth inhibition test with Pseudokirchneriella
subkapitata. The method is carried out in miniaturized version according
to the german DIN 38414 part 33.
The microbiological contact assay is used to determine
toxicity directly in soil. The test organism Arthrobacter globiformis is
a typical aerobic chemoheterotrophic bacteria in soils. The method is based on
the conversion of resazurine to resorufine by bacterial dehydrogenase activity,
and is measured against an uncontaminated control sample. The decontamination
process contains a countercurrent extraction reactor where the extraction
solvent is pumped up-stream through the soil and subsequently treated in an
electrolysis cell to recycle the solvent.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
To calculate the Pb-species distribution at
equilibrium the added Pb-species are used as input parameters. The results are
presented in tab. 1.
Table 1: Pb-species distribution
after achieving equilibrium
calculated with PHREEQC version 1.3
|
mineral phases |
formula |
Mr [g/mol] |
amount [mol] |
massPb [mg] |
|
anglesite |
PbSO4 |
303.25 |
5.35 10-6 |
1 |
|
cerrusite |
PbCO3 |
267.20 |
4.09 10-3 |
847 |
|
cotunnite |
PbCl2 |
278.10 |
4.08 10-3 |
845 |
|
galenite |
PbS |
239.25 |
1.39 10-15 |
0 |
|
lanarkite |
PbO:PbSO4 |
526.44 |
1.19 10-2 |
4947 |
|
laurionite |
PbOHCl |
259.65 |
5.23 10-5 |
11 |
|
phosgenite |
PbCl2:PbCO3 |
543.30 |
7.83 10-3 |
3246 |
The input species cerrusite and colunnite are
transformed partlyto phosgenite after reaching equilibrium while anglesite and
massicote result exclusively in larnakite. The formation of mixed Pb-salts like
phosgenite (PbCl2:PbCO3) and larnakite (PbSO4:PbO)
can be evaluated by x-ray diffractometer analysis.

Figure
1: X-ray diffractometric spectra of a solid obtained from a batch experiment
with PbO and PbSO4; as reference the spectra of massicote (PbO) is
marked with black arrows
These mixed salts has not been part of the reference
substance database. Therefore the XAFS data have not been analysed yet.
The thermodynamical calculations are also useful to
determine conditions like pH, solvent and solvent concentration for the
decontamination process. Due to these calculations, a citrate solution of 0.1
mol/l and pH 6 are selected to conduct the leaching experiment. The
complexation properties of citrate solution ensure the dissolution of all
Pb-species and avoid an excessive dissolution of goethite at a solid/liquid
ratio of 1:10 (fig. 2).

This model soil has been decontaminated with the
described circuit process from 10000 up to 50 mg/kg which would allow an
unlimited reuse of the soil according to german law. The remove of lead species
include all operationally defined fractions of the Zeien&Bruemmer and also
reduce the TOC-content in the soil.
The bioassays are applied to the model soil before and
after the extraction procedure, at first to the extraction agent (here citric
acid), and the compounds humic acid and goethite, respectively. Additionally
these single compounds in combination
with citric acid and a pure PbNO3 solution have been investigated.
Citric acid at concentrations above 100 mg/l causes a complete inhibition
regarding the test organism. Goethite itself shows no toxicity until it is
extracted with citric acid. The formation of Fe-citrate-complexes seems to
effect the test organism. In contrast to the behavior of goethite, the toxicity
of humic acid decreases after extraction with citric acid. These results
indicate that already the interaction of soil matrix compounds and citric acid
effects both test organisms even in absence of heavy metal species. But
likewise the toxicity of the pure Pb-solution is reduced by addition of citric
acid. Despite these results the extraction of the Pb spiked soil with citric
acid reduces the toxicity concerning both bioassays, but it could not be
evaluated whether the reduction of TOC or humic acid, respectively, in this
particular case or the removal of lead is responsible for the decreasing
toxicity. The results are summarised in table 2.
|
model soil |
Pb [mg/kg] |
TOC [%] |
Algae toxicity* |
contact test toxicity * |
||||
|
before |
9900 |
0.69 |
yes |
yes |
||||
|
after |
50 |
0.10 |
no |
no |
||||
|
*toxicity criteria > 20% inhibition of the test
organism |
|
|
|
|
||||
Further investigations have to be undertaken to answer
this question.
REFERENCES
Ure, A.M., Quevauviller, P., Muntau, H. & Griepink, B. (1993): Intern.
J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 51: 135-151.
Welter, E., Calmano, W.,
Mangold, S. and Tröger, L. (1999): Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 364: 238-244.
Zeien, H. & Brümmer, G.W.(1989): Chemische Extraktionen zur
Bestimmung von schwermetallbindungsformen in Böden. Mitteilgn. Dtsch.
Bodenkundl. Gesellsch. 59: 505-510.