IRON ACCUMULATION IN AEDES AEGYPTI LARVAE, FOOD BOLUS AND FECAL PELLETS

Paulo Pedrosa*1, Desiely Silva Gusmão2, Carlos Eduardo Rezende1 & Francisco José Alves Lemos2. Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, 1Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais; 2Laboratório de Biotecnologia, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes, 28015-620, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

E-mail: pedrosa@cbb.uenf.br

 

Abstract

The mosquito larval stage is always aquatic and shuttles from the subsurface where it feeds on microorganisms to the surface to obtain oxygen through a snorkel-like breathing apparatus. Mosquito larvae can be found in numerous habitats and the distribution of some mosquito species depends on their ability to cope with extreme situations such as polluted water and water with a high saline. The biological responses (e.g. accumulation, toxicity) of A. aegypti larvae face to heavy metals is, however, poorly known. Our goal is to investigate iron accumulation in A. aegypti larvae, food bolus and fecal pellets and the role of peritrophic matrix as a barrier to the iron passage through it.

 

Introduction

The distribution of mosquitoes is largely based on the availability of suitable sites for larval growth. Because larval mosquitoes are aquatic, water is essential. However, natural waters vary considerably in composition, from the nearly distilled resulting from rain to salt marshes and alkaline lakes (Hagedorn, 1996). On the other hand, mosquitoes larvae have developed physiological mechanisms that allow them to invade niches that are extreme in terms of salt composition. Also, aquatic systems are threatened more and more by many types of pollutants including heavy metals (Peters, 1992). The biological responses (e.g. accumulation, toxicity) of A. aegypti larvae to heavy metals is, however, poorly known. The gut of most of the insects contains an extra cellular layer separating the food of the epithelial cells. This layer is denominated of peritrophic matrix (PM) (Lehane,1997). Our knowledge concerning this structure is still very incomplete. However, the study of this structure has been intensifying due to its probable function as a barrier against pathogens and toxic agents present in the food.

Also, being detritivorous and being preyed upon by insectivorous vertebrates and arthropods, they can play a significant role in accumulating and further transferring toxic metals to higher trophic levels (Devkota and Schmidt, 2000). Jamil and Hussain (1992) showed that the transfer of heavy metal in an aquatic ecosystem could be very high. Our goal was to investigate the role of peritrophic matrix as a barrier to high levels of iron by  measuring the  accumulation of this heavy metal in larvae, food bolus and fecal pellets of A. aegypti.

 

Methods

We used A. aegypti mosquitoes larvae from the colony maintained in the Laboratory of Biotecnology of Bioscience and Biotechnology Center at North Fluminense State University.

150 larvae were maintained in petri dishes containing 20 mL of distilled water (control) and FeSO4 solutions (0.5mM, 5mM and 50mM in distilled water). After 16h the larvae were dissected in saline solution (0.15M NaCl) and their food bolus, carcass (larva without food bolus) and feces were  dried at 90º C for 36h. The samples  were weighed and decomposed with 5 ml of concentrated nitric acid on a hot plate. After initial digestion was added 150 ml of hydrogen peroxide to the samples. After evaporation to dryness the residue was dissolved in 10 mL of 0.5 M nitric acid and analyzed by ICP-AES.

The iron concentrations in the blank samples were also determined and these values were subtracted from samples values to avoid any unwanted contamination during sample preparation.

Mean and standard deviation of all determinations of the heavy metal was calculated and the data are given in mmol Fe g -1 dry weight of the sample.

 

Results and Discussion

Control larvae maintained in distilled water (control) presented a concentration of 3,9 mmol Fe g-1 while in the iron enriched medium (0.5 mM, 5 mM, 50 mM) the concentrations were higher (66 mmol Fe g-1, 132 mmol Fe g-1, 290 mmol Fe g-1, respectively). We observed that iron concentration in the larva, carcass, food bolus and feces is increased when the larvae are maintained in the medium containing different Fe concentration (0.5mM, 5mM and 50mM, respectively) (figure 1). At the highest concentration (50 mM) we don’t observe the iron saturation of the tissues except to the feces (figure 1). When we compare iron concentration in the carcass (figure 1B) and food bolus (figure 1C) we observe that most of the ingested iron is retained in the gut lumen.

Larvae maintained in absence of iron didn’t produce feces. Differently, iron-treated larvae excrete a huge amount of feces (data not shown). The enhanced production of feces enveloped by peritrophic matrix (a chitin-protein extra cellular gut matrix) appears to be a physiological response of the larvae for the iron elimination.

The feces of larvae submitted to 5 mM FeSO4 were washed to separate the iron from peritrophic matrix. Only 13% of iron was solubilized indicating that most of the iron  is associate to the PM and/or is in an insoluble form (e.g. iron oxide). Based on the bioconcentration factors corresponding 0.5 mM FeSO4 (Larva = 1.102, carcass = 1.101, food bolus = 8.102 and feces = 2.103)  we can conclude that iron is concentrated in the food bolus suggesting the possibility of the peritrophic matrix as an effective barrier against iron incorporation (figure 2). Besides to block iron penetration, PM also can bind this heavy metal. Preliminary measurements (data not shown) demonstrate that isolated PM can sequestrate approximately 700 mmol Fe g-1.

In order to verify whether PM could function as a barrier to heavy metals we did a preliminary study to see the iron incorporation into the larvae tissues. First, we  observed that A. aegypti larvae when maintained under three different iron concentrations solutions excreted great amount of brownish feces (feces are composed of PM and food residue) while control larvae didn’t excrete at all. As the larvae was kept in a FeSO4  solutions without any kind of food we can conclude that  iron was responsible for the color and production of the feces. The figures 1 and 2 show that the iron concentration observed in food bolus and feces are much higher than in larvae and carcass. These data indicate that most of iron is retained in the larvae midgut lumen and excreted in an insoluble form as a feces component. As fecal pellets proved to serve in the transport of organic matter from surface waters into deeper layers, they might be involved in the transport of pollutants far from the source of pollution (Turner and Ferrante, 1979). It has been shown that fecal pellets may contain elevated concentrations of heavy metals (Boothe  and Knaeur, 1972). The PM is a probable responsible for the bioaccumulation of iron in the larvae midgut. It binds and retains most of the ingested iron in the food bolus. Dissected PM from 50 mM FeSO4 treated larva appear quite distinct to the control larvae PM with a magnify fluorescence.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge the FAPERJ, CNPq, UENF and FENORTE for their financial support.

 

References

Boothe, P.N., Knauer, G.A. (1972). Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 270-274.

Devkota, B., Schmidt, G.H. (2000). Agric. Ecos. Environ 78, 85-91.

Hagedorn, H.H. (1996). Physiology of mosquitoes. In: Beaty, B.J. and Marquardt, W.C., editors, The biology of disease vectors, 1st ed. University Press of Colorado. Pp. 273-297.

Jamil, K., Hussain, S. (1992). Arch.  Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 22(4), 459-463.

Lehane, M.J. (1997) Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42, 525-550.

Peters, W. (1992) Peritrophic membranes. In: Bradshaw S.D., Burggren W., Heller, H.C., Ishii, S., Langer, H., Neuweiler, G. e Randall D.J. Zoophysiology, vol. 30, 1st edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 238 p.

Turner, J.T., Ferrante, J.G. 1979. Bioscience 29, 670-677.

 

D

 

CA

 

B

 

A

 

 

 Figure 1. Measurements of iron in larva (A), carcass (B), food bolus (C) and feces (D) according to increasing medium iron concentration. Each point represents the mean of three experiments.

 

 

 

 

B

 

D

 

CA

 

A

 

 

Figure 2. Relationship between medium iron concentration and bioconcentration factor in larva (A), carcass (B), food bolus (C) and feces (D).