FEDDS: The Florida Everglades Dry-Deposition Study
Preliminary Results from an Ongoing Investigation of the Dry-Depositional Loading of Mercury to the Florida Everglades Ecosystem
Frank
J. Marsik1, Gerald J. Keeler1, Elizabeth G. Malcolm1,
J. Timothy Dvonch1, James A. Barres1, Steven E. Lindberg2,
Hong Zhang2, Robert K. Stevens3 and Matthew S. Landis4
1University
of Michigan Air Quality Laboratory (Ann Arbor, MI, USA); 2Oak Ridge
National Laboratory (Oak Ridge, TN, USA); 3Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (Tallahassee, FL, USA); 4US Environmental
Protection Agency (Research Triangle Park, NC, USA)
[E-mail
Corresponding Author: marsik@umich.edu]
ABSTRACT
The Florida Everglades
Dry-Deposition Study (FEDDS) was designed to test the viability of new and
existing measurement techniques for use in the estimation of the
dry-depositional loading of speciated mercury to a mixed sawgrass (cladium jamaicense) and cattail (typha domingensis) stand within the Florida
Everglades.
Following the February 1999
“dry-season” intensive, results from water-based, surrogate surface
measurements indicate that for the period studied, the average daily
dry-deposition rate for total mercury to the site was 15.7 ± 9.8 ng/m2/day, with an average daytime (0900
to 1700 LT) rate of 21.8 ± 11.3 ng/m2/day and an
average nighttime (1800 to 0800 LT) rate of 10.3 ± 3.4 ng/m2/day. Concurrent measurements of elemental and
reactive gaseous mercury, as well as size-segregated particulate mercury, were
also made. These data will be used as
input into an inferential dry-deposition model for comparison with measured
results.
A second measurement
intensive was conducted during June 2000 in an effort to obtain summer, or
wet-season, estimates of dry-deposition to the same site. Results from both measurement intensives
will be presented.
INTRODUCTION
The discovery of elevated levels of methylmercury in freshwater fish in
South Florida prompted the State of Florida Department of Health, in March
1989, to issue limited-consumption and no-consumption advisories for some
species of fish found within the Florida Everglades. Since these initial advisories were issued, a number of
consumption advisories have been issued statewide. The observed elevated levels of methylmercury are a result of the
strong tendency of methylmercury to bioaccumulate up the aquatic food chain,
with human consumption of aquatic wildlife being a common endpoint. In a study of human consumption of food from
the Florida Everglades, Fleming et al.
(1995) indicated that the populations that were at particular risk include
sport fishermen, Everglades' residents and subsistence fishermen.
The atmosphere has been
found to be a significant pathway for the transport and deposition of mercury
in South Florida (Guentzel et al.,
1995; Dvonch et al., 1998; Dvonch et al., 1999), as well as other parts of
North American and Europe (e.g., Sorenson et
al., 1994; Hoyer et al., 1995;
Munthe et al. 1995; Lorey and
Driscoll, 1999). The relative importance
of atmospheric deposition pathways (wet- and dry-) varies considerably
depending upon the location considered.
Studies investigating the deposition of mercury to forested ecosystems
in Tennessee (Lindberg et al., 1994),
Sweden (Munthe et al., 1995) and
Vermont (Rea et al., 1996) have shown
both wet- and dry-depositional loading to be of importance. Guentzel et
al. (1995) suggest that wet-deposition is an important pathway for mercury
loading across South Florida during the summer season due to the high frequency
of convective storms. However, the
dry-deposition of mercury is also likely to be important across this region
during non-precipitation periods, especially during the months of October
through May, when precipitation is relatively infrequent.
The previous
studies investigating the atmospheric deposition of mercury to South Florida
have mainly focused on quantifying the contributions due to wet-depositional
fluxes. The results presented in this
paper represent the first effort to quantify the dry-depositional fluxes of
total mercury to the Florida Everglades.
METHODOLOGY
Two measurement intensives were planned as part of the Florida
Everglades Dry-Deposition Study. A “dry
season” intensive was performed during the period: 24 February to 04 March
1999. Preliminary results from this
study are presented in this paper. A
“wet season” intensive was conducted in June 2000.
Two approaches were employed during the
study, with dry-deposition estimates obtained using both direct and inferential
techniques. Direct measurements of
total mercury dry-depositional flux were obtained using a water-based,
surrogate surface technique developed by the University of Michigan Air Quality
Laboratory. To make this measurement,
aerodynamic frisbee-shaped deposition plates were deployed at a height equal to
the average height of the vegetative canopy.
Each deposition plate, made of Teflon, contained a removable well that
holds 300 ml of ultra-pure water. Both
daytime and nighttime samples were collected with daytime samples deployed from
0900 to 1700 local time and nighttime samples deployed from 1800 to 0800 local
time. All sample handling was performed
using particle-free gloves to insure that sample contamination did not
occur. Samples were analyzed for both
total mercury and trace metals within a Class 100 cleanroom at the University
of Michigan using techniques detailed in Landis and Keeler (1997) and Hoyer et al. (1995).
FEDDS SITE
MIAMI
![]()

Figure 1. Location of FEDDS
sampling site.
Modeled fluxes
were obtained using the inferential dry-deposition model of Hicks et al. (1987). In this technique, measurements of ambient chemical
concentrations of the gaseous and particulate species of interest are combined
with species-specific deposition velocities to “infer” rates of pollutant
dry-deposition to the surface of interest.
The model of Hicks et al.
(1987) mathematically describes the variations in the dry-deposition velocity
of a given species based upon an electrical resistance analogy. Namely, the delivery of a pollutant from the
atmosphere to a given surface is described in terms of a series of “resistances
to deposition” that arise due to meteorological, chemical and biological
processes that control pollutant delivery, adsorption and capture at natural
surfaces.
Until very
recently, little information has been available regarding the chemical levels
of mercury species in the atmosphere and preliminary estimates of the
dry-deposition of mercury to vegetation have employed the assumption that
reactive gaseous mercury (believed to be the dominant species that is
dry-deposited) behaves like gaseous nitric acid. Now, for the first time, measurement methodologies have been
developed to characterize the ambient concentrations of the three dominant
species of mercury: elemental [Hg(0)], reactive [Hg(II)] and particulate
[Hg(p)].
For this study,
elemental mercury was measured using Tekran 2537A continuous mercury vapor
analyzers. Reactive mercury was
collected manually using annular denuders coated with potassium chloride, and
with an automated Tekran 1130 Mercury Speciation Unit. Total particulate mercury was collected
using 47mm glass fiber filters in Teflon open-faced filter packs. Sample analysis was performed in a Class 100
cleanroom based upon the methods described in Keeler et al. (1995).
The flux of vapor phase mercury over Everglades vegetation has been found
to be bi-directional, thus two unique methods are being employed to measure
both the microscale (<1 m2), as well as the larger scale
(approximately 100 m2) emissive fluxes of elemental mercury from the
ecosystem. These methods involve state
of the art micrometeorological approaches that have been modified for
application to mercury in Florida, and an inert dynamic flux chamber (FC)
developed for mercury water surface flux measurements. The modified Bowen ratio (MBR) method is a
micrometeorological technique that is now widely used for measuring mercury
fluxes over soils and vegetation. The
method combines real-time trace gas flux measurements by eddy correlation with
high precision time-averaged concentration gradients of these trace gases and
mercury to obtain inferred fluxes of mercury from the ecosystem. Recent applications of the MBR approach over
wetlands in the Everglades Nutrient Removal (ENR) area by members of our
research team have proven highly successful (Lindberg et al., 1999). Through the
MBR approach, we are also collecting data on the fluxes of heat, CO2,
and water vapor to allow for the investigation of linkages between the surface fluxes
of mercury and plant photosynthetic processes.
The FC method uses a polycarbonate enclosure to directly measure the mercury concentration changes over a known surface area, from which dry deposition and emission rates can be computed directly. The FC approach allows for measurements of spatial flux patterns and for testing of Hg flux mechanisms through surface manipulations.
RESULTS
At the time of this writing, the laboratory
analyses has been completed for those samples collected during the 24 February to 04 March 1999 intensive. While data analysis is ongoing, preliminary
results from some portions of the study are currently available.
The results
from our water-based, surrogate dry-deposition surfaces are presented in Table
1. These values represent the average
dry-deposition measured using the two co-located deposition surfaces for each
measurement period.
TABLE
1
Average
Measured Total Mercury Dry-Deposition (ng/m2/period) during the 1999
FEDDS Measurement Intensive.
|
Date |
Period |
Measured Hg Dry-Deposition |
|
25-Feb |
Day |
7.1 |
|
25-Feb |
Night |
7.9 |
|
26-Feb |
Day |
7.9 |
|
26-Feb |
Night |
4.8 |
|
27-Feb |
Day |
14.2 |
|
27-Feb |
Night |
2.9 |
|
28-Feb |
Day |
5.1 |
|
28-Feb |
Night |
6.1 |
|
1-Mar |
Day |
8.6 |
|
1-Mar |
Night |
9.4 |
|
2-Mar |
Day |
8.7 |
|
2-Mar |
Night |
6.9 |
|
3-Mar |
Day |
1.9 |
|
3-Mar |
Night |
3.9 |
|
4-Mar |
Day |
5.5 |
|
4-Mar |
Night |
5.7 |
Considerable sample-to-sample variability can be observed. When viewed on a “per period” basis, the
average daytime total mercury dry-deposition for the period was 7.4 ± 3.6 ng/m2, while the average
nighttime total mercury dry-deposition for the period was 5.9 ± 2.1 ng/m2. Despite the fact that the nighttime period encompassed a longer
period of time (14 hours versus 8 hours), the average daytime dry-deposition
total exceeds that of the nighttime total.
This observation is likely the result of the fact that the generally
unstable atmospheric conditions found during the daytime periods resulted in a
greater rate of delivery of mercury to the surface. When scaled to a 24-hour deposition rate, the average daytime
rate was 21.8 ± 11.3 ng/m2/day and the average
nighttime rate was 10.3 ± 3.4 ng/m2/day.
As noted earlier, previous MBR measurements of the
flux of vapor phase mercury over Everglades vegetation found these fluxes to be
bi-directional. Preliminary results
from the vapor phase mercury flux measurements made during the 24 February to 04 March 1999 intensive are now
available and concur with the previous observations. Using the modified Bowen ratio approach
described earlier, measurements suggest that for the period studied the overall
average vapor phase mercury flux was 12 ± 20 ng/m2/hr. The large range in observed values
corresponds to the fact that net fluxes are generally positive during the day
(away from vegetation) and slightly negative at night (toward the vegetation). On average, daytime fluxes were found to be
approximately 32 ± 27 ng/m2/hr. These observed values were found to be in
the same range as those measured in the Everglades Nutrient Removal area by
team members Steve Lindberg and Tilden Meyers (NOAA-ATDD, Oak Ridge, TN)
[Personal Communication].
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank our sponsors for this project, the US Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Additionally, we would like to thank the South Florida Water Management District, without whose cooperation this project would not have been possible.
REFERENCES
Dvonch, J.T., J.R. Graney, F.J. Marsik, G.J. Keeler
and R.K. Stevens (1998). Sci. Total Environ., 213: 95-108.
Dvonch, J.T., J.R. Graney, G.J. Keeler and R.K.
Stevens (1999). Environ. Sci. Technol., 33: 4522-4527.
Guentzel, J.L., W.M.
Landing, G.A. Gill and C.D. Pollman, 1995: Atmospheric deposition of mercury in
Florida: The FAMS Project (1992-1994). Water,
Air and Soil Pollut., 80: 393-402.
Hicks, B.B., D.D. Baldocchi,
T.P. Meyers, R.P. Hosker, Jr., and D.R. Matt (1987). Atmos. Environ., 32: 1317-1322.
Hoyer, M., J. Burke and G.J.
Keeler (1995). Water, Air and Soil Pollut., 80: 199-208.
Keeler, G., G. Glinsorn, N.
Pirrone (1995). Water, Air and Soil Pollut., 80: 159-168.
Landis, M.S. and G.J. Keeler
(1997). Environ. Sci. Technol., 31: 2610-2615.
Lindberg, S.E., J.G. Owens,
and W. Stratton (1994): In: Mercury as
A Global Pollutant (J. Huckabee and C.
Watras, Eds.), Lewis Publishers, pp. 261-272.
Lindberg, S. E., H. Zhang,
and T. P. Meyers (1999): Final
Report Everglades Mercury Air/Surface
Exchange Study (E-MASE). South Florida
Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL.
Lorey, P. and C.T. Driscoll
(1999). Environ. Sci. Technol., 33: 718-722.
Munthe, J., H. Hultberg, A.
Iverfeldt (1995). Water, Air and Soil Poll., 80: 363-371.
Rea, A.W., G.J. Keeler and
T. Scherbatskoy (1996). Atmos. Environ., 30: 3257-3263.
Sorensen, J.A., G.E. Glass
and K.W. Schmidt (1994). Environ. Sci. Technol., 28: 2025-2032.