ZINC AND COPPER
ACCUMULATION IN SEDIMENTS IMPACTED BY LANDFILL WASTEWATERS IN JARDIM GRAMACHO,
SE BRAZIL
WT
Machado1*, MF Carvalho2, M Moscatelli1, LG
Rezende1, JEL Maddock1, RE Santelli1 and LD
Lacerda1
1- Dept. Geoquímica, Universidade Federal
Fluminense, Niterói, RJ 24020-007, Brazil
2- PETROBRÁS, CENPES, DIVEX, CEGEQ, Rio
de Janeiro, RJ 21949-900, Brazil
geowmac@vm.uff.br
We investigated the Zn and Cu accumulation in sediments
affected by a large landfill facility. Metal distribution similarities in
individual sediment cores suggest a common proximate source. Landfill leachate
concentrations also presented a consistent relationship between metals. These
results are consistent with a mixing of landfill leachate before its release to
adjacent sites, resulting in a consistent Zn/Cu ratio. Metal relationship in
more recent sediments from our sampling sites showed a degree of proximity to
those from landfill leachate in the order river bank > degraded mangrove
> mangrove forest. Sediments from the mangrove forest and degraded mangrove
sites seem to present a higher retention efficiency for Zn than Cu. This
suggest that a mangrove area located between the landfill and the river
probably affected past metal transport from the landfill to river sediments,
explaining the observed lower Zn/Cu ratio at the landfill-impacted area than in
upstream sewage-impacted sediments.
The contribution of different sources of heavy metals
affecting impacted environments should be elucidated in order to recognize
heavy metal pollution effects and to subsidy management strategies. Here, we
present data on the identification of the contribution of a large 20-years-old
landfill, located in a mangrove area in Jardim Gramacho (22°45’W, 43°15’S), at the west margin of Guanabara Bay (SE Brazil), to
the Zn and Cu sediment load in the surrounding area. Guanabara Bay is the most
important enclosed coastal bay in Brazil, and is characterized by anthropogenic
pressures associated to urban and industrial development. With a domestic
runoff discharge from at least 7.8 million of people, and the operation of
about 6,000 industries around its margins, the bay’s environmental quality has
become critical (Kjerfve et al.,
1998). In a preliminary study, we evaluated the use of heavy metals as tracers
of the past landfill contribution to the sediment metal load, to study the
influence of landfill sites on contaminated areas and water courses.
Two long sediment
cores (nearly 1 m length) were collected in a mangrove forest site (FM site),
dominated by Laguncularia racemosa,
and in a site where mangrove vegetation was degraded (DG site), between the
landfill and Guanabara Bay. One short sediment core (nearly 30 cm length) was
collected from the banks of the Sarapuí River (SR1 site), in the landfill
landward edge. Two samples of surface layers (10 cm depth) from Sarapuí River
bottom sediments were also collected, nearly 1 km upstream the landfill
influence area (SR2 site), and seven landfill leachate samples were collected
from interconnected leachate stabilization ponds (distanced at least 200 m),
located along the landfill edges. Sediment profiles were sliced and dried in
the laboratory. Mangrove roots were removed from the samples prior processing
for analysis. Metal concentrations in sediments were analyzed by flame AAS and
ICP-MS, after digestion in nitric and hydrochloric acid solutions. Leachate
metal concentrations were analyzed by ICP-MS, after a microwave digestion (EPA
method 3015). Precision, based on sample replicate analysis, was better than 9%
for sediment samples and within 11% for leachate samples.
We found elevated Zn and Cu concentrations in upper sediment
layers of all profiles (Table 1). Highest concentrations reached values as high
as 417 mg Zn g-1 and 120 mg Cu g-1 at the site SR, 360 mg Zn g-1 and 36 mg Cu g-1 at the FM site, and 170 mg Zn g-1 and 44 mg Cu g-1 at the DG site. At a subsurface depth, which ranged from
approximately 16 to 32 cm, cores from sites FM and DG showed a relatively
coincident concentration increase for both elements, in relation to deeper
layers. Above these depths of concentration increase, Zn and Cu were well
correlated in cores from stations FM (P < 0.024) and DG (P < 0.001), as
well as along the entire S1 profile (P = 0.001). Such similarities suggest a
common proximate source for both elements.
The potential of heavy metals as tracers for contamination
and sedimentation history has been demonstrated by the use of
concentration-depth variability as a record of metal inputs (Caçador et al., 1996; Payne et al., 1997), if the sediment metal load is preserved without
significant changes (e.g. by physical disturbance or diagenesis). Based on
these assumptions, we hypothesized that the observed metal concentration
increase in subsurface sediment layers were associated to landfill metal
emissions, started in a period which corresponds to the depth of concentration
increase in sediment cores.
Leachate metal concentrations ranged from 140-560 mg Zn L-1 and from 70-170 mg Cu L-1, while the duplicate sediment samples from SR2 site
presented values of 332-356 mg Zn g-1 and from 17-40 mg Cu g-1. We speculate that past drainage runoff (diluting and
transporting the leachate) and wastewater overflow from the landfill facility
composed a major factor affecting the past metal input to all studied sites,
whereas the upstream river sediments represent another metal source end
member.
Another way of using heavy metals as tracers for the
contamination record is the evaluation of the metal concentration-ratio
variability as a fingerprint of the contamination source (Krumgalz, 1993;
Benoit et al., 1999a,b). Besides the
metal record preservation without significant changes with time, this
evaluation is also based on the assumption that the source presents a unique
and consistent ratio of metals. Leachate Zn/Cu ratio showed a relatively low
variability, with an average of 3.1 ± 0.8 (± 1 SD), and
both metals concentrations significantly correlated (P = 0.032). This suggests
mixing of landfill leachate before its release to surrounding area, tending to
present a relatively constant Zn/Cu ratio. Sediments from SR2 site showed
fairly different metal ratios from those of leachate, ranging from 5.6-12, also indicating a high variability of
metal associations in upstream sewage-affected sediments. Table 1 shows that
metal concentration ratios tended to present values close to an average of 3.3,
along core S1. Long sediment cores showed a trend of metal ratio increase from deeper
to upper layers, except by relatively low variable values of core F3, implying
changes in metal input, retention and/or post-depositional alterations.
Metal-richer recent sediments from FM site averaged ratios of 9.4 (core F3) and
7.0 (core F4), while in station DG cores averaged ratios of 4.9 (core D1) and
4.7 (core D2).
These results
suggest similar ratios between core S1 and landfill leachate, whereas cores
from station DG showed a higher degree of proximity to the low leachate ratio,
in contrast to values from deeper layers, and a lower degree of proximity to
the leachate ratio was observed for FM site data. As demonstrated in Figure 1,
considering the line of average leachate metal ratio as representing a metal
source end member, according to the principle applied by Benoit et al. (1999a), we observed a clear
degree of proximity to the landfill data in the order core S1 > core D1 >
core D2 > core F4 > core F3.
Table 1. Zinc and copper concentration
profiles (mg
g-1)
and Zn/Cu ratios in sediment cores. Below 30 cm depth, average values are
shown. na = not available.
|
|
Core F3 |
Core F4 |
Core D1 |
Core D2 |
Core S1* |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Depth (cm) |
Zn
Cu ratio |
Zn
Cu ratio |
Zn
Cu ratio |
Zn
Cu ratio |
Zn
Cu ratio |
||||||||||
|
0–2 |
245 |
29 |
8.4 |
146 |
27 |
5.4 |
127 |
33 |
3.9 |
164 |
37 |
4.5 |
na |
na |
na |
|
2–4 |
293 |
32 |
9.2 |
226 |
29 |
7.7 |
113 |
25 |
4.6 |
171 |
37 |
4.6 |
417 |
113 |
3.7 |
|
4–6 |
225 |
29 |
7.8 |
221 |
35 |
6.3 |
132 |
31 |
4.2 |
157 |
36 |
4.4 |
367 |
106 |
3.5 |
|
6–8 |
230 |
28 |
8.3 |
246 |
36 |
6.8 |
137 |
35 |
3.9 |
160 |
39 |
4.1 |
332 |
101 |
3.3 |
|
8–10 |
361 |
30 |
12 |
259 |
36 |
7.3 |
143 |
35 |
4.1 |
162 |
41 |
4.0 |
287 |
88 |
3.3 |
|
10–12 |
209 |
26 |
8.2 |
236 |
31 |
7.5 |
115 |
25 |
4.6 |
174 |
44 |
4.0 |
267 |
83 |
3.2 |
|
12–14 |
256 |
27 |
9.6 |
178 |
26 |
6.8 |
93 |
22 |
4.3 |
165 |
43 |
3.9 |
283 |
81 |
3.5 |
|
14–16 |
185 |
20 |
9.1 |
121 |
15 |
8.0 |
142 |
28 |
5.0 |
154 |
28 |
5.4 |
276 |
79 |
3.5 |
|
16–18 |
174 |
15 |
12 |
67 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
174 |
30 |
5.9 |
156 |
38 |
4.1 |
239 |
76 |
3.1 |
|
18–20 |
78 |
8.0 |
9.7 |
52 |
5.6 |
9.2 |
157 |
28 |
5.6 |
160 |
31 |
5.1 |
296 |
96 |
3.1 |
|
20–22 |
65 |
4.8 |
13 |
58 |
7.2 |
8.1 |
120 |
25 |
4.7 |
153 |
28 |
5.5 |
352 |
121 |
2.9 |
|
22–24 |
48 |
6.5 |
7.4 |
65 |
6.8 |
9.6 |
102 |
18 |
5.8 |
146 |
26 |
5.7 |
310 |
106 |
2.9 |
|
24–26 |
75 |
7.4 |
10 |
77 |
12 |
6.7 |
107 |
19 |
5.7 |
124 |
21 |
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
26–28 |
90 |
7.3 |
12 |
92 |
8.2 |
11 |
102 |
18 |
5.7 |
88 |
15 |
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
28–30 |
73 |
7.5 |
9.7 |
59 |
6.4 |
9.2 |
99 |
17 |
5.7 |
92 |
14 |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
> 30 |
56 |
5.7 |
10 |
59 |
5.9 |
11 |
53 |
7.7 |
7.1 |
65 |
9.3 |
7.4 |
|
|
|
* For core SR1, the depth intervals
indicated as 20–22 cm and 22–24 cm correspond to depths 20–25 cm and 25–30 cm,
respectively.
Sediments from
SR2 site showed similar Zn concentrations and much lower Cu concentration than
SR1 site sediments, suggesting that upstream sediments are not sufficiently
Cu-rich to promote the low Zn/Cu ratio observed in SR1 site. If the trends
above can be generalized for mangrove sediments, the mangrove area located
between the landfill and the river probably affected the past metal transport
to SR1 site sediments, explaining the lower Zn/Cu ratios at the
landfill-impacted than in upstream sediments. The lack of similarity of metal
ratios, “different fingerprints”, may be an indicator of metal redistribution
(Krumgalz, 1993). Cores from sites FM and DG showed higher Zn/Cu ratios in
upper layers than landfill leachate, possibly due to diagenetic processes in
mangrove rhizospheres, resulting in a higher Zn retention capacity than for Cu,
and/or due to a contribution of other sources. In fact, all cores consisted of
fine-grained and gray to black colored sediments, except by subsurface
orange-gray mottled horizons presented by mangrove forest sediments, due to
sediment oxidation by O2 release by mangrove roots, inducing
differentiated geochemical conditions (Lacerda, 1998). Moreover, we have
observed a lack of correlation between Zn and Cu distributions in another
mangrove forest site in Jardim Gramacho (Machado, unpubl. data), associated to
high Zn/Cu ratios.
Modifications in the relationship of wastewater constituents
can occur with the time, during dilution and transport processes and after
accumulation in a new environment, and should be better evaluated in order to
validate the application of our preliminary approaches. However, the results
above attest the importance of the landfill contribution to Zn and Cu
accumulation at the studied sites, and can explain the different trends of
metal relationship observed.
Figure 1. Relationship between Cu and Zn
concentrations in landfill leachate ´
200 (Û)
and in metal-rich surface and subsurface layers of sediment cores from FM site
(s,
core F3; ¿,
core F4), DG site (¯,
core D1; r,
core D2) and SR1 site (+, core S1). The line indicates the average metal ratio
of landfill leachate samples.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We acknowledge the logistic support from Queiroz Galvão
Engenharia, the analytical support from PETROBRÁS/CENPES and grants to WM, LGR,
RES and LDL from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
(CNPq).
Benoit G, Rozan TF, Patton PC, Arnold CL (1999a),
Estuaries 22: 65-80.
Benoit G, Wang EX, Nieder WC, Levandowisky M, Breslin
VT (1999b), Estuaries 22: 167-178.
Caçador I, Vale C, Catarino F (1996), Est. Coastal
Shelf Sci. 42: 393-403.
Lacerda
LD (1998), Biogeochemistry of trace metals and diffuse pollution in mangrove
ecosystems. Okinawa, International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems.
Payne M, Chenhall BE, Murrie M, Jones BG
(1997), J. Coast. Res. 13: 1181-1191.