TRACE METAL DISTRIBUTION IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS FROM THE EASTERN BRAZILIAN COAST
Luciano Guedes; Cristina M.M. Souza; Carlos E.V. de Carvalho; Alvaro R.C. Ovalle; Carlos E. Rezende &, Marcelo G. Almeida (Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais, CBB, UENF. Av. Alberto Lamego 2000, Horto, Campos dos Goytacazes, R.J. CEP 28.015-620. Brazil. Tel +55 24 726-3709. Fax +55 24 726-3720. E-mail: cristal@cbb.uenf.br )
Abstract
The present work studied the heavy
metals distribution on surface sediments in the Brazilian Continental Shelf.
Total and potential available extractions were performed in the total bulk of
sediments in order to evaluate the contamination and bioavailability of these
elements for marine biota. Granulometric analysis were also performed in order
to characterize the sediments and help the trace metal distribution
interpretation. The sediment granulometry showed a predominance of the
Silt-Clay fraction (up to 80%). The total metals concentrations (Fe, Ni, Mn, Cu
and Cr) were negatively correlated to particle size, except Zn that presented
no correlation. Positive correlation was also observed among the studied
metals, probably indicating an association between these elements and the
litological source. The potentially available fraction presented higher concentrations
in shallow areas near the influence of the small and medium size rivers. Heavy
metals concentrations showed decrease values seaward possibly due the transport
rivers capacity and the mixture with biogenic sediment.
Introduction
The present study is part of the Brazilian and German Bilateral Scientific Cooperation known as Joint Oceanografic Projects (JOP’S II). The sediment sampling was performed in the beginning of 1995 on board of the Research Vessel Victor Hensen along in Brazilian waters.
The East Brazilian continental shelf include a very interesting geomorphological feature the Abrolhos Bank, which form a natural barrier to the Brazil Current (Ekau, et al. 1999). This barrier promotes upwelling areas in the south of the Abrolhos Bank (Vitória Edge), increasing nutrient input, biodiversity and local primary productivity (Gaeta et al. 1999). The large number of small and medium sized rivers in this region and the lack of information on pollutants input, increase the importance of the study of heavy metal from natural and antropogenic sources. These elements reach the coastal zone mainly by rivers, generally being adsorbed in solid phase and subsequently deposited in sediments by chemical and mechanical processes. In sediments metals could be associated with specific geochemical phases that are susceptible to changes depending on environmental conditions. In sediments metal associations will define the availability and incorporation rate to the bentonic organism (Salomons & Förstner, 1984).
Material and Methodology
In this work were analyzed samples
collected on 22 stations, comprising 5 sampled areas during the period of
28.12.94 to 11.01.95, from Doce River at Espírito Santo to estuarine zone
of São Francisco River at Sergipe.
The
sediment granulometry was analyzed following the methodology described by
ABNT/NBR 7181(1984). The metal (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cr, Ni and Cu) extractions were
based on methodology described by Krause et al. (1995) modified by Almeida (1998). Metal determination
was performed using an atomic absorption spectrophotometry, with flame (Varian,
model AAS 120). All the samples were digested in duplicate and blanks were
analyzed in order to avoid sample contamination. The precision and accuracy of
the analytic method was determined by analyzing certified estuarine sediment
(Standard Reference Material 1646a) provided by NIST/USA. The
available heavy metal fraction (Exchangeable + Oxydizible + Reducible) was
determined using the methodology described by Carvalho (1997), where 2g of
sediments were added to 15 ml of HNO3 (0,5N) at room temperature and
kept shaking for 24h. The extracts were than filtered and analyzed for heavy metal concentration in an ICP-AES
(Varian - Liberty Series II).
Results
Table
1 presents heavy metals concentration intervals in superficial sediments (mg.g -1) in both of the studied
fractions (total and available). Heavy metals distribution along different
stations in the total and available
fractions are shown in the Figure 1. The
results showed the following order of abundance for total concentration Fe> Mn> Cr> Zn> Ni> Cu.
Fe, Mn and the Cu showed the same total concentration distribution, in some cases the difference among the stations of the same sampling area, were orders of magnitude higher. Those differences were observed for the first two elements in the Canavieiras area and for Cu, in the Caravelas area. Fe presented the largest differences in the measured concentrations in Canavieiras, Caravelas and Espírito Santo areas. The other elements presented smaller differences of concentrations among the stations of same area, with factors that varied between 1.1 to 7.7.
All the metals presented representative distribution in the potential available fraction of the sediment, being Zn the element that presented the most homogeneous and expressive distribution in this fraction, followed by manganese. Among the areas, the Espírito Santo area had the highest percentile of available phase for all the metals (Fe = <DL - 8,7 %; Mn = 36 % - 96 %; Cr = 0,30 % - 8,0 %; Zn = 15% - 60 %; Cu = <DL - 20 % and Ni = 1,0 - 1,7 %).
Some sampling stations presented concentrations of metals (Fe, Cr, Zn, Cu and Ni) higher than the world average for sediment (Salomons & Förstner, 1984), with enrichment factors varying from 1.1 (Cr and Zn) and 1.5 times (Fe, Cu and Ni). The Espírito Santo area presented the highest enriched factors among all the studied areas for Fe, Cu, Cr, Zn and Ni.
The granulometric analysis results
showed a very heterogeneous distribution along all sampling sites. Because of
this large variation even in the same sampling areas, the establishment of an
average sediment granulometry was avoided.
Table 1. Total and available fraction
heavy metal concentrations on superficial sediment (mg.g -1)
|
|
Heavy Metals (mg.g -1) |
||||||
|
Areas |
Fe |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Cu |
Ni |
|
|
SF |
A |
<DL |
189 |
0.31 |
15.4 |
0.23 |
0.86 |
|
|
T |
37779 – 43984 |
311 - 424 |
70 -79 |
59 - 71 |
7.9 - 43 |
50 - 63 |
|
CN |
A |
<DL - 3418 |
3.0 - 248 |
<DL - 6,2 |
<DL - 17 |
<DL - 3,4 |
<DL – 3.1 |
|
|
T |
2733 - 40046 |
34 - 433 |
24 - 94 |
22 - 58 |
9.7 - 30 |
31 – 63 |
|
CB |
A |
8.0 - 723 |
<DL - 68 |
0.04 – 1.4 |
15 - 20 |
<DL - 0,05 |
<DL – 0.4 |
|
|
T |
7259 - 21943 |
55 - 302 |
32 – 58 |
32 - 54 |
9.6 - 14 |
28 – 49 |
|
CV |
A |
<DL - 984 |
<DL - 173 |
0.01 – 3.7 |
15 - 23 |
0.01 – 3.7 |
0.04 – 0.68 |
|
|
T |
1704 - 37718 |
56 - 335 |
27 – 54 |
25 - 48 |
0.85 - 12 |
28 – 43 |
|
ES |
A |
416 - 7813 |
177 - 564 |
0.32 – 6.7 |
16 - 17 |
<DL – 5.1 |
0.62 – 1.2 |
|
|
T |
50623 - 78580 |
483 - 644 |
66 - 112 |
27 - 107 |
6.6 - 51 |
57 – 73 |
SF= São Francisco; CN= Canavieiras;
CB= Cabrália; CV= Caravelas; ES= Espírito Santo; T= Total fraction; A=
Available fraction; <DL= lower than detection limit.
Discussion
The
heavy metal distribution in surface sediments along the sampling stations
showed different patterns in each area. This trend could be related to the
distinct granulomety and/or to different
sources of these elements
(riverine x marine) and the distance of each sampling site from the point
source. It is already known that the these factors increase heavy metals
concentration in the water column and consequently in surface sediments
(Lacerda et al. ,1992).
Tropical coastal sediments generally present a natural enrichment in Fe concentrations (Almeida, 1998) mainly due to the high weathering and erosion of the soils. This trend was observed in the Espírito Santo area for both fractions when compared to the others areas, although the increase in the available fraction values probably suggests the influence of antropogenic activities, once the distribution of that element in areas without pollution is limited to the residual fraction of the sediment (Salomons & Föstner, 1984). The distributions of Cr and Cu in this station also presented the same trend, corroborating the hypothesis of possible antropogenic influence.
Significant
positive correlation between Fe and Mn, and among those two elements and Cr, Zn
and Ni in the total fraction was observed. According to Salomons & Förstner
(1984), those correlation are probably indicating that this elements have the
same source, possibly lithologic, characteristic of sediment non impacted,
therefore, of natural origin. Although Espírito Santo area is close to
urbanized areas, the other areas were characterized by processes related to the
natural variations in the fluvial flows, according to the proximity of some
stations the outlet of small rivers placed along the sampling stations. Espírito Santo, São Francisco and
Canavieiras areas presented total concentrations above the world average for
sediments for Cu (1,3), Cr (1,3) and Ni (1,2). The observed concentrations in
these sampling sites are probably related to the presence of riverine material from the São Francisco and
Belmonte rivers, that are responsible for a significant seasonal influence
the in the coastal zone (Danielson et.
al. ,1983; Jennerjahn et al. ,1996).
Mn
and Zn presented an important participation in the available fraction of the
sediment. The manganese showed an accentuated remobilization capacity in the
Espírito Santo area (up to 98 %), suggesting a strong association to substrate
susceptible to redox reactions. The Zn presented values similar of
concentration potentially in the available fraction along all the sampling
stations, except for the station 8. That behavior is characteristic of these
element in both natural and impacted reas (Almeida, 1998 ;Souza et. al.,
1986).
A significant positive correlation was
observed between Fe and Mn and the other studied metals (Cu, Cr and Ni) in the
available fraction, probably indicating the importance of the co-precipitation
process controlled by Fe and Mn oxy-hydroxides. The oxides and hidroxides of Fe
and Mn are considered as one of the main responsible geochemistry by the
deposition and accumulation of metals in marine and fluvial sediments (Yucesoy
& Ergin, 1992; Summerhayes & Thorpe, 1996).
The
predominance of the sand size fraction in Canavieiras, Cabrália and Caravelas
areas suggests a very dynamic area, mainly due to the absence of large rivers
and the strong influence of the oceanic current. According to Summerhayes and
Thorpe (1996) during the last regression there was a predominance of the
silt-clay fraction in the sediment, although the coastal areas are
characterized by heterogeneous
sediments granulometry. This variability generally depend on the proximity
of sources and or dynamic transport processes characteristic of shallow coastal
platform waters. Although one of the stations at this area presented distinct granulometry distribution with the
predomination of silt (39 %) and fine sands (36 %) fractions.
In
some areas as Canavieiras and Cabrália large variations in the metal
concentrations, up to one order of magnitude, were observed for some of the
studied metals (Fe, Mn and Cu). The stations that had high metal concentrations
also presented the predominance of the sand fraction. This trend is probably
suggesting the influence of the sand fraction in the metal transport, maybe
promoting alterations in the relationship between the heavy metals and the
finest fraction of the sediment (Goh & Chou, 1997), this could be related
to the presence of small rivers in the area (Melo et. al. 1975).
In comparison to other studies in
estuarine areas and of continental platform, the present study presented medium
concentrations similar to these, having presented for Mn inferior values, but
for Fe, Cr and Ni close values the found highest concentrations. Comparing with
Souza, (1995), whose study was accomplished in a river considered non impacted,
the concentrations presented similar variations for Fe, Ni, Cu and Cr, and
inferior for Mn.
Conclusion
Espírito Santo and São Francisco
regions were presented the highest metals concentrations probably due to the
presence of the Doce and the São Francisco Rivers as the main metal input. In the Canavieiras area Belmonte river's influence is clearly
shown although the effect of the coastal currents promote a rapid dillution and
a large variability in the granulometric distribution.
All the studied metals presented
positive correlation with iron and manganese, indicating association to the
lithologic source of the material and the formation of Fe and Mn oxy-hydroxides
in the continental shelf waters reinforcing this process as an important
sedimentation process. In the general a decrease of heavy metals concentrations
toward the ocean was observed, probably due to lost of the transport capacity
and the dilution effect of caused by the mixture of riverine material (enriched
in metal content) with marine material (generally poor in metal content).
The granulometric distribution
presented correlation with the distribution of the metals and with the distance
of the coast, corroborating with observations done by other authors. The metals
presented more homogeneous distribution near the coast, in areas of smaller
energy. The available fraction presented larger concentrations near the coast,
rivers outlet and areas with possible antropogenic influence.

Figure 1 – Heavy metal (total and available fraction)
distribution in all sampling stations.
REFERENCES
ABNT. NBR 7181 .Solo – Análise
Granulométrica ( Método de ensaio). Dezembro 1984. , 120p
Almeida M G 1998. Geoquimica de
Metais Pesados na Lagoa de Cima - RJ. M.Sc. thesis, Campos dos Goytacazes, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense,
114p.
Carvalho C.EV 1992.Distribuicão de
Metais Pesados em Sedimentos da Plataforma Continental Nordeste e Sudeste do
Brasil. M.Sc. Thesis , Niteroi , Universidade Federal Fluminense, 91p.
Carvalho CEV 1997 Distribuição
Espacial, Temporal e Fluxo de Metais Pesados na Porção Inferior da Bacia de
Drenagem do Rio Paraíba do Sul, R.J.
Ph.D. Thesis , Universidade Federal Fluminense, 165p.
Danielson LG Niagnusson B
Westerlund S Zhang
K. 1983. Estuarine, Coastal and
Shelf Science , 17, 73-85.
Förstner U Wittmann GTW 1983. Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment. Springer – Verlag. Pp. 486.
Goh BP.L. Chou LM 1997
Environmental Monitoring and Assesment. 44: p.p.67-80,
Jennerjahn T C Ittekkot V Carvalho C.EV Preliminary Data on
Particle Flux off the São Francisco River, Eastern Brazil. In Particle Flux in the Ocean , John Wiley & Sons Ltd (SCOPE) 1996. ,
340p
Krause P Erbsloh B
Niedergesab R. Pepelnik, R Prange,
A 1995. Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 353: 3-11.
Lacerda LD Carvalho CEV
Rezende C E Pfeiffer WC
1992. Marine Pollution Bulletin..
Melo U. Summerhayes C.P Ellis J.P
Contr. Sedimentology 4, p.p.78 - 116, 1975.
Salomons W Fostner, V 1984. Metals
in the Hydrocycle. P. 6 - 10,63 - 93.
Seeliger U. et al., 1988. Metals of Coastal Environments of
Latin America. Springer Verlag, Berlin,, 297 pp.
Souza
C.J.M 1995. Partição de Elementos Traço nos Sedimentos a Noroeste da
Plataforma Continental Amazônica., M.Sc. Thesis, Niteroi , Universidade Federal Fluminense, 78p
Souza, C.M.M Pestana, MHD Lacerda LD
(1986) Sci. Tot. Environm. 58:
63-72.
Summerhayes, C.P Thorpe S.A. 1996, Oceanography – An
Illustred Guide. Manson Publishing L.t.d., 148p
Acknowledgements
The
authors would like to thank the support by JOPS Project. and FENORTE