Aqueous Geochemistry of Mercury in Three River
Systems Impacted by Mining Activities
by
Jean-Claude J. Bonzongo, Environmental Studies Program, Austin College, Suite
61553, Sherman, TX 75090--jbonzongo@austinc.edu
W.B. Lyons, Byrd Polar Research Center, Ohio State University,
Columbus, OH 43210-1002; J. J. Warwick,
Dpt of Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville,
FL 32611-6450; Jadran Faganelli, Marine Biological Station
Piran, 33000 Slovenia; Milena Horvat, Jozef Stefan Institute,
Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; M.E.
Hines, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska
Anchorage, AK 77000; P. J. Lechler
and J. Miller, University of Nevada,
Reno, NV 89557.
ABSTRACT
The
aqueous geochemistry of mercury (Hg) was investigated in 3 aquatic systems
impacted by either Hg- or gold-mining. The first aquatic system, the Idrija
River, Slovenia flows near the Idrija Hg-mine, which is the second largest Hg
mine in the world with continuous mining and smelting for 5 centuries. It has
been estimated that during the 500 years of mining, about 30,000 tons of Hg
were introduced to the surrounding environment. The resulting contamination in
this case has been associated primarily with the use of inefficient smelting
technologies. In contrast to the Idrija River where cinnabar was mined, the
Carson River in Nevada, USA and the Madeira River, Brazil have been
contaminated by metallic-Hg (Hg0) used in the amalgamation process
to extract gold from crude ores. The Carson River was the site of intensive
gold (Au) and silver (Ag) mining for over 50 years, resulting in an estimated
7,000 tons of Hg lost to the river and its watershed. Finally, the Madeira
River in the Brazilian Amazon, is a site of an ongoing use of Hg0 in
Au-prospecting by gold miners. This study was conducted in order to determine
different factors controlling aqueous methyl-Hg levels/abundance in aquatic
systems with high total-Hg concentrations, but flowing on different
continents/climate and different geological formations. Using ultra-clean
sampling and analytical techniques, water samples were collected along
longitudinal transects in the 3 river systems and analyzed for Hg levels and
speciation, as well as several other key physicochemical parameters. Our
results show evidence of Hg contamination in the 3 river systems, with THg
concentrations up to 0.020, 0.32, and 10 µg/L (or ppb) for the Madeira, Idrija
and Carson rivers, respectively. Measured physicochemical parameters and data
from the literature are used to comprehend the fate of Hg in each investigated
river system.
INTRODUCTION
Mercury
(Hg) is a significant environmental contaminant that accumulates to toxic
levels in biota. But concerns over its bio-geo-chemical cycling are mostly due
to the toxicity of methyl mercury (MeHg), known for its ability to
bio-accumulate and bio-magnify in food chains. The principal pathway for human
exposure to this toxic metal is the consumption of Hg-contaminated fish, and
such exposure could result in toxicity of the central nervous system. In fact, during the past several years,
there has been a growing attention paid to Hg as a pollutant as exemplified by
a number of international conferences devoted exclusively to Hg in the
environment. This interest stems from the unique characteristics of Hg, which
include its high vapor pressure resulting in volatilization and global
dispersal via the atmosphere; its chemical speciation; the requirements for
ultra-clean sampling, handling, and analytical techniques in order to measure it
properly; and as mentioned above, its potential for bio-accumulation and
bio-magnification.
Beside
diffuse sources and industrial/municipal wastewater discharges, historic and
current mining activities constitute important sources of Hg introduction into
waterways. This is due to: (1) the use of metallic Hg (Hg0) in the
almagamation process to extract Au and Ag from crude ores, and (2), the mining
of cinnabar (HgS). Results published to date show that Hg released from these
sources is in the inorganic form, whereas Hg bio-accumulates in food chains in
the methylated form. It is important to note that, the form in which Hg is
introduced into an aquatic system dictates its availability for methylation.
For example, Hg0 released from the amalgamation process should
undergo oxidation to be accounted for in the pool of Hg available for
methylation. On the other hand, the combination of Hg and S in cinnabar
reduces/eliminates the availability of Hg to methylating-agents. Finally, in
addition to limitations related to the form of Hg, other biogeochemical
parameters can either enhance or inhibit the methylation of Hg(II). Therefore,
rates of environmental transformations of Hg and the accumulation of produced
methyl-Hg may be site-specific, regardless of total Hg levels present in the
system.
In
this study, we have investigated the aqueous geochemistry of Hg in river
systems with very high Hg concentrations in order to identify factors that
could limit MeHg abundance in each system. The following is a brief description
of the 3 study sites.
(1)--IDRIJA
and the IDRIJCA RIVER: The Idrija Hg mine is located at the southwestern edge
of the Alps in the northwestern Slovenia, about 30 Km east of the Italian
border. It is the world second largest Hg deposit, surpassed only by the
Almaden in Spain. The principal ore mineral in Idrija has always been cinnabar
(HgS), but metallic Hg did also occur in a few ore bodies (Bancroft et al.
1991). Five hundred years of Hg extraction from the Idrija ore deposit have
resulted in a widespread contamination of the environment. It is estimated that
during the active mining period, about 30,000 tons of Hg got introduced into
the environment, primarily due to poor smelting technologies. Mercury was
released into the environment through both emission from ore smelters and mine
tailings, resulting in the contamination of the atmosphere, and terrestrial-
and aquatic-systems. A recent study of Hg speciation in tailings materials by
Biester et al., (1999) showed that older tailings (i.e. those produced before
the 20th century) contained mostly Hg as HgS. They attributed that
left over to inefficient roasting techniques used in the past. In younger
tailing materials, however, they found that Hg0, either sorbed to
mineral matrix or free, as well as traces of oxidized Hg as HgO became
predominant. Finally, in a leaching experiment on younger tailing materials,
Biester et al. (1999) found that soluble Hg existed in reactive forms. These
findings suggest that the introduction of Hg-contaminated younger tailing
materials in waterways could bring about Hg species other than HgS, and the
above information on Hg speciation could find its importance in comparative
studies between the Idrija River and aquatic systems contaminated with Hg
species other than HgS.
The
Idrija Hg mine is located in the Idrijca River's watershed. A recent
investigation of Hg concentrations in sedimentary materials in the Idrijca
River watershed showed that riverine, as well as river overbank sediments were
highly contaminated (Gosar et al., 1997). Gosar et al. found that beside the
upstream section of the river, which had an average Hg concentration of about 2
ppm, sections downstream of the Idrija mine had Hg levels in hundreds of
ppm.
(2)--Carson
River: In 1859, the Comstock Lode was discovered in western Nevada, USA.
Metallic-Hg was then used for nearly over 50 years to extract Au and Ag from
crude ores. These mining operations conducted in the Carson River watershed
generated extensive hazardous wastes, resulting in significant Hg contamination
of both the abiotic and biotic compartments in the watershed. Here,
contaminated mining wastes previously accumulated in mill tailings were later
dispersed throughout the drainage basin, in large part due to fluvial
processes. Hg levels in river-bank materials reach hundreds of ppm, while
concentrations in reverine sediments are usually less than 20 ppm. The Carson
River flows in a very arid environment in the eastern Sierra Nevada, where
evapo-concentration processes affect the biogeochemistry of the river.
(3)--Madeira River: The Madeira River basin
is located in the southwestern Amazonian region and drains a very large
watershed, mostly covered by tropical rain forest ecosystems (Pfeiffer et al.,
1991). In most fluvial systems in the Amazon, artisanal mining became an island
of prosperity in a sea of poverty. Metallic Hg is used in the almagamation
process to recover fine alluvial gold. In the Madeira River, most of the gold
mining occurs in the river itself along a 300Km longitudinal transect. While Hg
mining in Idrija and Hg use in the Carson River Drainage basin can be
classified as historic, Au-extraction in the Madeira River is an ongoing
operation. The mining process uses boats and divers, as well as mechanical
dredges to remove riverine-sediment. Heavy particles are then concentrated
gravimetically and amalgamated with Hg0 to form Au-Hg complexes. The
latter is then burned releasing Hg vapor in to the atmosphere. The entire
process releases also a significant amount of Hg directly into waterways.
Pfeiffer et al. (1991) report that 100 tons of Hg were lost into the Madeira
River from 1979 to 1985, and THg concentrations in sediment range from 0.05 to
2.62 mg/Kg (or ppm).
As stated above, the form in
which Hg is released into the environment determines its reactivity and
transformation rates. For river systems considered in this study, Hg is
primarily introduced into waterways as metallic Hg in the Madeira and Carson
rivers, and also as cinnabar in the Idrija River. However, from differences in
their geographical locations and climate, bedrock geology, and water
biogeochemistry, one could anticipate differences in MeHg levels.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Surface
water samples were collected along longitudinal transects from headwaters to river
deltas in each aquatic system, using ultra-clean sampling techniques. Due to
fact that all samples were analyzed in the US, in both the Madeira and Idrija
rivers, samples for the determination of total concentrations (THg and TMeHg)
were collected directly into acid cleaned and pre-acidified Teflon bottles (in
situ preservation). In addition to the in
situ acidified samples, water samples were also collected without
acidification. The latter were earmarked for the determination of dissolved
fractions of Hg after filtration through acid-cleaned 0.45µm membrane. Our
research group has been working on Hg in human impacted rivers on a worldwide
scale. Data obtained to date show that for water samples collected as far as
Russia and Slovenia, concentrations obtained from both pre-acidified and
non-acidified samples do fall nearly on the 1:1 line on a graphical
representation, suggesting that no significant change or loss occurs in
non-acidified samples during long-distance transportation. During transportation
and/or shipping, samples were kept chilled in the dark and analyzed within 2 to
3 weeks from collection date.
The
accurate quantification of often very small quantity (ppt) of Hg generally
present in both polluted and non-polluted natural waters requires an extremely
sensitive, low background, noise free analytical technique. The method of
choice is cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CV-AFS). This technique
was used to obtain information on the chemical speciation of Hg as its solution
forms include species out of thermodynamic equilibrium due to biological
interactions. Total-Hg, including both dissolved and particle-associated forms,
were analyzed by subjecting whole water samples to BrCl/SnCl2,
followed by gas-phase sparging with Hg-free N2 and trapping of Hg0
onto gold-coated sand (Bloom and Creciulus, 1983; Gill and Fitzgerald; 1987).
The Hg0 was then thermally desorbed from the gold trap in a stream
of Hg-free helium and quantified by CV-AFS. Methyl-Hg in water samples was
first separated from its original matrix by distillation or extraction in an
organic solvent (Bloom, 1989; Horvat et al. 1993a; 1993b) and then ethylated
using sodium tetraethylborate (Bloom, 1989), followed by CV-AFS detection after
GC-separation and thermal decomposition of alkyl-Hg.
Overall, our results show
evidence of contamination in the 3 river systems, with Hg concentrations
spanning a wide range of values (Table 1). Absolute values of THg increase in
the order MadeiraàIdrijaàCarson, while the absolute
values of methyl-Hg increase in the order IdrijaàMadeiraàCarson. The longitudinal
distribution of THg concentrations in the 3 river systems shows that Idrija and
Madeira Rivers have their peak values near mining operation sites, followed by
a decrease in concentrations due to either the removal via sedimentation of
contaminated particles or dilution by cleaner waters from tributaries, or both.
In contrast, the Carson River flows in an arid environment, where
evapo-concentration and Hg affinity to fine clay particles sustain high THg
concentrations downstream up to the terminal artificial lake; Lahontan
Reservoir.
Table 1: Concentration ranges (in ng Hg/L) of THg and
MeHg in surface waters of the 3 river systems
(*DL = Detection Limit: 0.008ng/100ml for THg, and
0.0042ng/100ml for MeHg)
|
IDRIJA RIVER, SLOVENIA
|
MADEIRA RIVER, BRAZIL
|
CARSON RIVER, NEVADA
|
||||||
|
THg |
MeHg |
%MeHg |
THg |
MeHg |
%MeHg |
THg |
MeHg |
%MeHg |
|
2.77-322 |
DL–0.613
|
0
to 4.52 |
2.25-20.05 |
0.61-1.825 |
0
- 24 |
4
- 7585 |
0.3-7.2 |
0
- 12 |
|
Dissolved THg |
Dissolved MeHg |
%Dissolved
MeHg |
Dissolved THg |
Dissolved
MeHg |
%Dissolved
MeHg |
Dissolved THg |
Dissolved
MeHg |
%Dissolved MeHg |
|
0.43-39.23 |
*DL-0.094 |
0
-- 7.70 |
0.28-8.06 |
0.31-0.647 |
0
-- 100 |
0.2
- 88 |
0.08-3.06 |
0
- 10 |
In these 3 river systems, Hg enters waterways mostly in the
inorganic form. Since most, if not all, of Hg in fish tissues is methyl-Hg, it
is important to understand the factors governing the production and
bio-availability of methyl-Hg. Ideally, experiments determining potential rates
of Hg(II)-methylation and MeHg demethylation should be conducted to investigate
factors controlling Hg transformations in the systems. However, from a simple
observational approach such as the one used in this study, the determination of
bio-geo-chemical parameters known from laboratory experiments to either enhance
or inhibit methyl-Hg production can be used in linear regressions to assess
their potential effects on ambient levels of methyl-Hg. For example, it is known
that in most tested estuarine and freshwater sediments, sulfate reducing
bacteria (SRB) are key players in the production of methyl-Hg (Compeau and
Bartha, 1985; Gilmour and Henry, 1991; Gilmour et al., 1992; Bonzongo et al.,
1996; Chen et al. 1997). This ties methyl-Hg production to anoxic conditions,
which in the river systems under consideration in this study are found only in
bed sediments, and seasonally, in bottom waters of reservoirs in the Carson and
Idrija River systems. Other parameters such as dissolved organic carbon (DOC),
pH, major ions, etc may have significant impact on the fate of Hg in aquatic
systems.
The above-described approach
shows that when methyl-Hg concentrations is normalized to total-Hg levels in
surface waters of the three river systems, an overall decreasing trend of the
fraction of Hg present as MeHg is observed with the increase in water sulfate
concentrations. While the decrease is observed over a wide range of sulfate
concentrations (from 3 to 200mg/L) for Idrija River, a steep decrease is
observed in the Madeira River over a very small range of sulfate concentrations
(i.e. 3 to 6mg/L). In anoxic conditions, high sulfate concentrations may result
in the removal of Hg available for methylation due to HgS formation. In 1991,
Gilmour and Henry hypothesized that sulfate concentration far above10 mg/L
could result in the inhibition of Hg-methylation, while lower values would
enhance Hg-methylation. Apparently, this hypothesis doesn’t hold true for the
Madeira and Idrija rivers, based on water data. In both the Madeira and Idrija
rivers, the abundance of methyl-Hg decreases significantly in river sections
with sulfate concentrations far below 10 mg/L. This observation may suggest
that the complexity of natural environments may exacerbate the negative effect
of sulfate on Hg-methylation, even in the presence of sulfate concentrations
where one would expect significant methyl-Hg production. On the other hand, SRB
may not be the major methylating microbial population in these systems.
Finally, the above tentative explanations can be confirmed only through studies
of sedimentary transformation of Hg in each system.
In contrast to the Idrija and
Madeira Rivers, the Carson River shows an apparent increasing trend of MeHg/THg
ratios with increasing sulfate concentrations up to values as high as 35 mg SO42-/L
before showing a decrease for greater sulfate concentrations. The determination
of potential rates of Hg methylation in sediment samples collected from several
locations in the Carson River suggests that SRB are the main MeHg producers.
Also, SRB's methylating activity is negatively impacted by increasing
concentrations of either sulfate or any other group-VI oxyanion (Bonzongo et
a., 1996; Chen et al., 1997). The evapo-concentration in this arid environment
favors the build up of major ions, including those ions with inhibitor
potential for Hg methylation by microbial populations.
Overall,
the geology of the watershed always controls the background chemistry of a
river. A parameter such as the pH of river is greatly influenced by the bedrock
composition. In addition, vegetation and rainfall play a role in the chemical
composition of the river water. With regard to pH, the Madeira River has acidic
pHs values (~5.6), while the Carson and Idrija Rivers have neutral to alkaline
pHs. For the Madeira (lowest THg concentrations) and Idrija rivers, the
difference in pH values could, at least partly, explain the fact that absolute
MeHg concenttrations are greater in the former than in the latter. Alkaline pHs
tend to reduce MeHg accumulation as they favor higher demethylation rates
(Bonzongo et al., 1996).
Other information related to Hg contamination, transformation, and
bioaccumulation in the above 3 systems will be discussed in the presentation,
based on data available in the literature. Meanwhile, the key points of this
study can be summarized as follows.
SELECTED REFERENCES
Andrea,
M.O. 1986. In the importance of chemical speciation in environmental processes.
Bernhard, M., F.E. Brinkman, and P.J. Sadler, Eds. Springer Verlag, berlin. pp
301-335.
Bancroft
et al., 1991. The Mineralogical Record, 22: 201-208.
Biester et
al., 1999. J. Geochemical Exploration, 65: 195-204
Bonzongo
J.C. et al., 1996. Environ. Poll. 92: 193-201.
Bonzongo
J.C. et al., 1996. Toxicol. Chem. 15: 677-683.
Chen, Y. et al., 1997. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16(8): 1568-1574.
Compeau,
G.C. and R.Bartha, 1985. Appl. Environ. Microbiology. 50: 498-502.
Gosar et
al., 1997. . J. Geochemical Exploration, 58: 125-131
Gilmour,
C.C. and Henry, A.E., 1991. Environ. Pollut. 71: 131-169.
Gilmour,
C.C. et al., 1992. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26: 2261-2287.
Jackson,
T.A., 1989. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 3: 1-30.
Pfeiffer
et al., 1991. Forest Ecology & Management, 38: 239-245.